사망진단서(사체검안서) 상의 선행사인으로부터 사망통계의 원사인이 선정되는 비율: (3개 대학병원에서 교부된 사망진단서를 중심으로) |
|
박우성1, 박석건2, 정철원3, 김우철4, 탁우택5, 김부연6, 서순원7, 김광환7, 서진숙8, 부유경9 |
1단국대학교 의과대학 소아과 2단국대학교 의과대학 핵의학과 3성균관대학교 의과대학 내과 4인하대학교 의과대학 방사선종양학과 5동국대학교 의과대학 신장내과 6통계청 7단국대학교병원 의무기록과 8삼성서울병원 의우기록과 9인하대학교병원 의료정보과 |
The rate that underlying causes of death for vital statistics are derived from the underlying causes of death recorded at death certificates: (a study on the death certificates issued from three university hospitals) |
|
Woo Sung Park1, Seok Gun Park2, Chul Won Jung3, Woo Chul Kim4, Woo Taek Tak5, Boo Yeon Kim6, Sun Won Seo7, Kwang Hwan Kim7, Jin Sook Suh8, Yoo Kyung Pu9 |
1Department of Pediatrics, Dankook University Medical College 2Department of Nuclear Medicine, Dankook University Medical College 3Department of Internal Medicine, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine 4Department of Radiation Oncology, College of Medicine, Inha University 5Department of Nephrology, Dongguk University Medical College 6Ministry of Statistics 7Department of Medical Record, Dankook University 8Department of Medical Record, Samsung Seoul Hospital 9Department of Medical information, Inha University Hospital |
|
|
Abstract |
Background To examine the problems involved in writing practice of death certificates, we compared the determination of underlying cause of death for vital statistics using recorded underlying cause of death in issued death statistics. Methods We collected 688 mortality certificates issue in year of 2,000 from 3 university hospitals. And we also collected vital statistics from ministry of statistics. The causes of death were coded by experienced medical record specialists. And causes of death determined at ministry of statistics for national vital statistics were mapped to causes of death recorded at each death certificates. The rate that underlying causes of death for vital statistics were derived from underlying causes of death recorded at issued death certificates were analysed. Results 64.5% of underlying cause of death for could be derived from underlying cause of death recorded at issued death certificates, 8.6% derived from intermediate cause of death, and 3.9% derived from direct cause of death. In 23% of cases, underlying cause of death could not be derived using issued death certificates. The rate that underlying cause of death for vital statistics could be derived from underlying cause of death recorded at death certificates was different between 3 university hospitals. And the rate was also different between death certificates and postmortem certificates. We classified the causes of death using 21 major categories. The rate was different between diseases or conditions that caused death too. Conclusion When we examined the correctness of death certificate writing practice using above methods, correctness of writing could not be told as satisfactory. There was difference in correctness of writing between hospitals, between death certificates and postmortem certificates, and between diseases and conditions that caused death. With this results, we suggested some strategy to improve the correctness of death certificate writing practice. |
Key words
death certificates;mortality statistics;cause of death; |
|